"Mint Sauce" <stanmould@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:zUt3b.954$hz1.563@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
>
> Judge and jury, then?  And can you substantiate your libel that I
> 'continually attempt to censor ... 'etc?
>
And *you* have the temerity to accuse *me* of incomprehensible posts? If I
could 'substantiate' my allegation, it wouldnt be 'libel', would it?

> > > Jeez, you really have problems, don't you?  You have made such a
> > > massive leap of *il*-logic, that I wonder how you manage to
> survive
> > > if that's how your thinking processes work.
> > >
> > Where is anything Ive said there wrong? I found the confession in
> your own
> > damn post - now youre saying you were lying when you said that?
>
> Are you suggesting I was lying?  Careful now.  That social workers
> web site you run could go down the pan if you are not careful.
>
Your inability to understand the question is not my problem, nor that of
anyone Im associated with. I *asked* if you were lying.

> > > WHY have you decided you are somehow 'better' than me, or anyone
> > > else?  WHY did you suddenly arrive on 10th July with your first
> ever
> > > post under your P&S name with the following stupidity (note the
> > > offensive sig) -
> >
> > Snip for bandwidth sake - I dont deny any of that.
>
> Thank you.  Noted.
>
> If you read it Stan you'd
> > see EXACTLY what I meant by it. In one post you say you have no
> interest in
> > publishing names and addresses and then immediately you tell
> someone thats
> > precisely what youre going to do with his data "come Friday". I
> was pointing
> > out the hiliariously stupid poster who contradicted himself so
> > transparently.
>
> Look in the mirror, boy.
>
This bits important, so whats the betting that you snip it in your reply?
Thank you for confessing your crime, albeit in the process of accusing me of
same. Thats okay. Now, lets very carefully disect that chunk above shall we?
You wondered why I posted here on that date and insinuated your intellect
was somewhere in the minuses. Well its quite plain. You stated that you had
no intention of revealing addresses. When it was pointed out that statement
was b*ll*cks, you issued a challenge to repost details of where you had said
you would reveal addresses. I pointed it out to you. You got upset.

> That's no excuse for you to deliberately target a person, just
> because you have formed an irrational dislike for them.  You do
> wriggle a lot, eh?

Oh dont feel singled out Stanley. I try to ridicule stupidity *wherever* I
find it, not just with you!

> > > > No, I read it in a newsgroup posting which Stan himself
> authored,
> > >>  where he talks about having no assets to pay
> > >
> > > You were utterly stupid then.  You've no idea about me.  You
> just
> > > read something, are utterly incapable of applying anything
> > > resembling thought to it, and then just assume it's true.  You
> then
> > > continue with that utter lack of brain and base everything else
> you
> > > ever think on an assumption and prejudice.  I bet you read the
> Sun.
> > >
> > Stan, watch closely now. *YOU* said you dont have means to pay.
> Not someone
> > else, *you*. Now you say Im stupid for assuming that to be true.
> What are
> > you saying Stan, that you were lying then?
>
> See above.  And try applying some thought next time.
>
I fail to see any other interpretation. YOU stated you have no means to pay.
Now you say Im stupid to believe that. The only conclusion I can draw from
your allegation that Im stupid to believe it is that youre suggesting the
original comment was untrustworthy. But *you* made the original comment? Now
come on Stan, or anyone else reading. I'd like someone to come up with an
alternative explanation of that situation. If such an explanation is
forthcoming then of course I shall read it carefully. Note I didnt say I
would apologise immediately, because of course I havent accused you of
anything so theres nothing to apologise for is there?

> You thrust your delusional need to appear superior to others almost
> every time you post.  Take a look back, and look in the mirror ...
> Like bragging about your Dinky toys,

I 'bragged' that my cars are prizewinning in response to your suggestion
that the one I displayed for you was <qoute> skanky <unquote>. I thought
this might convince you of your mistake. I was obviously wrong ;o)

>your bus,

Ive never 'bragged' about my bus! I posted and asked for comments on how to
deal with a problem with it - is that what youre referring to???

> your putting down of
> others for no reason whatever.  I'm going to make mincemeat of you,
> my lad, if you can't see what you've done and then apologise for it,
> and then learn some humility.  And then, if at al possible, learn to
> STFU before opening your gob.
>
No Mould, Im afraid I just cant bring myself to do it. My drinking buddy has
warned me that our little spat must soon cease, not because Ive said
anything actionable but merely because I have huge amounts to lose and you
have nothing. I cant continue to take the 10,000/1 chance that you might
find some decrepit old wig who falls for your line of bovine excrement,
notwithstanding the fact that you have no way of paying my legal bills when
you inevitably lose. Yes I could apologise, although I know not what for.
But if youre waiting can I suggest you dont hold your breath?

> And this is the chap who can't see how arrogant and self-centred he
> is?  You've just done it again, FFS!!  Jee-ZUS!
>
Well if you will insist on calling my motors skanky you cant really moan
when I point out how good it is can you?

> > Aww so close! Go on Stan, dont pussyfoot about! Go the extra half
> inch and
> > *genuinely* solicit harrassment of me in person. Come on, youre a
> brave man
> > aint ya? After all, remember youve nothing to lose,,,
>
> Be careful  Don't EVER accuse me of harassing you.  It's what you do
> to me under cover of anonymity, isn't it?  For now ...
>
Youve stalked me into two other groups so far. Youve researched who owns web
domains to try to get my location. Sorry, do you have another answer?
Whatever, its of no consequence. Like I said above, you were fun to bait for
a while, but the attraction quickly fades. The entertainment value doesnt
compensate for the albeit tiny risk. I'll keep reading here to have a giggle
at your expense while you dangle your baitless hooks for other posters. I
might even comment now and then on your obvious lack of anything resembling
a life, but dont count too much on it. Have fun with your meaningless little
existence Stan ;o)