Subject: | Re: McGrath or Thorpe?
| Date: | Sun, 20 Jul 2003 22:11:04 +0100
| From: | "David Lewis" <lewis@rmplc.co.uk>
| Newsgroups: | uk.sport.cricket
|
David North <dnorth@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bfet1t$dpbo9$1@ID-182826.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "David Lewis" <lewis@rmplc.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bf6m8v$tca$1@newsfeed.th.ifl.net...
> >
> > Dean Jarratt <d.jarratt@ukonline.spamless.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:bf6g6m$li0$1$830fa79d@news.demon.co.uk...
> > > "David North" <dnorth@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:bf4cvc$51eie$1@ID-182826.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > "Dean Jarratt" <d.jarratt@ukonline.spamless.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > > news:betpnj$66j$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
> > > > >
> > > > > "David North" <dnorth@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote in
message
> > > > > news:bepka5$7oc9m$1@ID-182826.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > > > "Dean Jarratt" <d.jarratt@ukonline.spamless.co.uk> wrote
in
message
> > > > > > news:beglkv$3hp$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
> > > > > > > "David North" <dnorth@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk>
wrote in
> > message
> > > > > > > news:bef4vv$4ihap$1@ID-182826.news.dfncis.de...
> > > > > > > > "Dean Jarratt" <d.jarratt@ukonline.spamless.co.uk>
wrote in
> > > message
> > > > > > > > news:3f092a48$0$7735$fa0fcedb@lovejoy.zen.co.uk...
> > > > > > > > > "David Lewis" <lewis@rmplc.co.uk> wrote in
message
> > > > > > > > > news:be8iei$19k$1@newsfeed.th.ifl.net...
> > > > > > > > > > Looks to me that the number 5 slot in the
1st test is
> > heading
> > > for
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > straight
> > > > > > > > > > choice between Anthony McGrath & Graham
Thorpe.
> > > >
> > > > --snip--
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'd pick both of them, and wouldn't play Giles.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Which would mean the team looking as follows:-
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Trescothick
> > > > > > > > > Vaughan
> > > > > > > > > Butcher
> > > > > > > > > Hussain (c)
> > > > > > > > > Thorpe
> > > > > > > > > Stewart
> > > > > > > > > McGrath
> > > > > > > > > Flintoff
> > > > > > > > > Johnson
> > > > > > > > > Gough
> > > > > > > > > Anderson
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > They'll never make a batsman of Flintoff if he goes
in at 8,
and
> > > > > they'll
> > > > > > > never make a Test bowler of
> > > > > > > > him if he's the 4th pace bowler.
> > > >
> > > > --snip--
> > > >
> > > > > > > I'd consider his role at number 8 to be a very
> > > > > > > important position, and he certainly wouldn't be a 4th seamer,
his
> > > > > bowling
> > > > > > > has come along amazingly well.
> > > > > > >He'd bowl a lot of overs in my book.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In your team, I'm sure he would, as he is the obvious stock
bowler
> > of
> > > the
> > > > > main four, although with
> > > > > > no spinner, all of them will probably have to bowl a lot of
overs if
> > > > > conditions are good for
> > > > > > batting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vaughan, Butcher, and McGrath all are capable bowlers in 'my'
team.
> > > >
> > > > I think they'd struggle to control the runs on a flat pitch compared
to
> > a
> > > specialist spinner.
> > >
> > > Yes you're quite right, but Ashley Giles and the term 'specialist
spinner'
> > > can only be loosely connected at this point in his career.
> > >
> > Yes, but I think the SA series will be make or break time. I know it
was
> > only a few overs, but I was pleased to see him being more attacking in
the
> > last ODI - maybe the penny's dropped. As Atherton has said, he's a
better
> > bowler than he has shown recently.
>
> Surely he has just been bowling the way his captains have asked him to?
Tufnell was often used in
> the same defensive manner, but I doubt that it was the bowler's choice to
do so in either case.
> --
> David North
I don't know. I thought I read somewhere that it was Tufnell's decision to
go over the wicket, but I may be wrong.
David
|