Subject: | Re: Ed Smith scores another century
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:21:21 +0100
| From: | "Dean Jarratt" <d.jarratt@ukonline.spamless.co.uk>
| Newsgroups: | uk.sport.cricket
|
"Robert Henderson" <Philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:C4C6SBBhRsF$EwPX@anywhere.demon.co.uk...
> In article <bf6drs$g9u$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk>, Dean Jarratt
> <d.jarratt@ukonline.spamless.co.uk> writes
> >"> >>
> >> >> Mmmmm...that problematic no 3 England spot shouldn't be problematic
> >> >> much longer. RH
> >> >
> >> >It's not problematic damn it!
> >> >
> >> So, a no 3 averaging 35 or less in three out of four consecutive series
> >> before this season is not cause for concern? RH
> >
> >England v Zimbabwe 2003 - Butcher 184 runs @ 92 avg.
>
> I said before this season. RH
>
> >Australia v England 02-03 - Butcher 318 runs @ 31.8 avg.
> >England v India 2002 - Butcher 212 runs @ 35.33 avg.
> >England v Sri Lanka 2002 - Butcher 339 runs @ 84.75 avg.
> >New Zealand v England 01-02 - Butcher 176 runs @ 29.33 avg.
> >
> Which agrees with what I said. RH
No it doesn't... your quote was "So, a no 3 averaging 35 or less", you can
clearly see that he averages over 35 in 2 series and under 35 in 2 series.
Hair splitting yes...but still accurate.
|