Subject: | Re: And the next one is..
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:03:50 GMT
| From: | "Dave.C" <davemcc@ignore.blueyonder.co.uk>
| Newsgroups: | alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.meteorology,uk.sci.weather,sci.geo.oceanography
|
Do you know a bloke called Michael McNeil by any chance?
Dave
"Weatherlawyer" <Weatherlawyer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138661674.732150.206750@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Actually I haven't the foggiest, to coin a phrase, or to put it another
> way after watching the late BBC apology for a weather view:
>
> As with my previous comment on the subject vis a vis foggy weather,
> dissipation of occlusions, closely packed isobars and changes of phase
> of the moon following runs of successively similar weather sells; there
> is going to be another large magnitude earthquake very, very soon.
>
> Fuckwits insist that I have to fit it in a window. Can meteorologists,
> with all the power and the might of their departments of defence give
> a window for lightning strikes? Had the lightning conductor not been
> invented there wouldn't have been a cat in hell's chance.
>
> Today, they are to be congratulated if they get the whereabouts of
> thunderstorms in such windows. Here is the window for seismic events:
>
> Anytime now!
>
> There is imminent danger looming, so pass the word around to budding
> coal miners, aviation enthusiasts and would be earthquake predictors
> that The Weatherlawyer has spoken once more.
>
> Scour the world's weather maps for close isobars and occluded fronts,
> search the various data bases that you all had time to set up to prove
> me wrong. AND TELL TO ME THAT THE NEXT 7M PLUS IS NOT ON ITS WAY.
>
> (Or not as the case may be.)
>
> ( I'm going to look a plonker aren't I? But suppose I kept silent?)
>
|