| Subject: | Re: An experiment to prove the helmet law proponants RIGHT (or wrong)
| | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:10:49 +0800
| | From: | "Marty Wallace" <mart@geo.net.au>
| | Newsgroups: | alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,aus.bicycle,bc.cycling,nyc.bicycles,uk.rec.cycling
|
"DiscoDuck" <fornewsgroups@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:1105925983.596645.140320@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> STILL alive unharmed.
> Can someone explain to me how this is possible since cycling is
> supposed to be so risky according to helmet law proponents?
>
Go troll in some other place you DROPKICK.
|