"Jane" <nospam@all.com> wrote in message news:3f8f0c28@news.greennet.net...
>
> "LordSnooty" <Lord_Snooty@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:q4ntovohgr16cr8jngse97kohlmi3ppos8@earthlink.net...
> > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:13:38 +0100, "Jane" <nospam@all.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >"LordSnooty" <Lord_Snooty@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a3jtov4rqessbseckl2e9sdfubihugts6f@earthlink.net...
> > >> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:49:29 +0100, "Jane" <nospam@all.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >"Michael Saunby" <msaunby@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:bmk3d0$380$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Do you care about civil liberties and support the freedom to hunt?
> > >> >
> > >> >We all care about civil liberties, but your so-called freedom to
hunt
> > >> >isn't one of them. Animal rights groups have worked very hard to
> > >> >ban it, and the public are behind them, and those who continue to
> > >> >hunt after the ban will be breaking the law. Your senseless cruelty
> > >> >is going to make you a criminal. Have you thought about that?
> > >>
> > >> It's strange how those who bleat about infringement of civil
liberties
> > >> are often the very people who deny the same consideration to other
> > >> species.
> > >>
> > >> It's a tragedy to think that there really are people out there that
> > >> cannot see the beauty in everything, what kind of mentality really
> > >> makes someone want to kill something?
> > >>
> > >> I am all for democracy and freedom, but only in the right hands! haw
> > >> haw.
> > >>
> > >Who will the police protect once haunting is banned? The hunters?
> > >Not any more! It'll be the hunt saboteurs, for a change, because
> > > they'll be in the right, morally and legally.
> >
> > Quite.
> >
> > > You and your so-called
> > >right to hunt, plus the way you use it as an excuse to kill animals
> > >under the name of conservation have had it. Do you know why?
> > >Because the British public have had it ...... with you!
> >
> > You do realize what side of the fence I stand?
> >
> I do now. Sorry about that. Your post doesn't sit right in the thread,
> and so I thought I was re-reing Michael Saunby.

oops!
>
>
>