"LordSnooty" <Lord_Snooty@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:a3jtov4rqessbseckl2e9sdfubihugts6f@earthlink.net...
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:49:29 +0100, "Jane" <nospam@all.com> wrote:
>
> >"Michael Saunby" <msaunby@despammed.com> wrote in message news:bmk3d0$380$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
> >>
> >> Do you care about civil liberties and support the freedom to hunt?
> >
> >We all care about civil liberties, but your so-called freedom to hunt
> >isn't one of them. Animal rights groups have worked very hard to
> >ban it, and the public are behind them, and those who continue to
> >hunt after the ban will be breaking the law. Your senseless cruelty
> >is going to make you a criminal. Have you thought about that?
>
> It's strange how those who bleat about infringement of civil liberties
> are often the very people who deny the same consideration to other
> species.
>
> It's a tragedy to think that there really are people out there that
> cannot see the beauty in everything, what kind of mentality really
> makes someone want to kill something?
>
> I am all for democracy and freedom, but only in the right hands! haw
> haw.
>
Who will the police protect once haunting is banned? The hunters?
Not any more! It'll be the hunt saboteurs, for a change, because
 they'll be in the right, morally and legally. You and your so-called
right to hunt, plus the way you use it as an excuse to kill animals
under the name of conservation have had it. Do you know why?
Because the British public have had it ...... with you!