"Lamb Chop" <nothisisntme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bikfdk$afcp3$1@ID-204635.news.uni-berlin.de...
>

snip Andrew's wriggling> >

> > But he hasn't actually sued anyone has he?
> >
> Hasnt he? Im genuinely surprised - I thought he had.

Which precisely demonstrates my point.

You have fired off a barrage of defamatory and harassing remarks
about me all based on YOUR OWN ASSUMPTIONS.

You 'thought' this, you 'thought' that, but in fact you have not
applied one iota of thought.

> Well heres where your assumptions let you down. See you think I
have enough
> interest to look it up. I dont.

Ah.  So you admit that you cannot be bothered to even check if your
assumptions have any validity.  Nice one.  That'll go down well.
How much are your Dinky toys worth, eh?

> > Oh come on, do you come out with so much tripe that you can't
remember
> when you
> > misrepresent a post for your own purposes :) If you ever crack
using MIDS
> then
> > have a look at this one Message-ID:
> > <ATu0b.58$HX5.14@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net> and tell us why
you twist
> the
> > Rice post so that you can have a go at Stan or are you going to
tell us
> yet
> > again that's not what you meant :) I think that post of yours
says a lot
> about
> > you and the lengths you will go to, to continue your obsession
with Stan.

And a completely unwarranted obsession, at that.  I think he is just
going to have to be the first one I deal with.  He's not got the
thousands of post that the loonies such as Snot and Husberk have
behind them.  There's onlt a few hundred of his on Google - much
easier to print off and present in a dossier.

> Obi you really could save me a deal of time by simply deciding
which side of
> the fence to be on and staying there. If you want to simply make
snide
> observations from the sidelines and ignore everything that someone
posts
> back in argument then thats fine, I can just label you as another
uk.legal
> nutter along with Corley and Jon and simply ignore you.

Mirror ...

If on the other hand
> you *really* want to debate points then youll have to stop
deliberately
> twisting what someone says and actually try some comprehension.
What I mean
> is - I'd *like* to continue to talk with you, since you at least
appear to
> have some knowledge of the groups issues prior to my arrival and I
would
> like to know about that. On the other hand, at the moment you look
to me
> like a wetsuited diver looks to a shark - you really fancy whats
inside, but
> its just too much damn work to get the wrapper off

HAAAH!!  Mirror ...