Machuka Al-Sukaka <Non'O'Yo'Business@scat.scat.scat> wrote in
news:ab4uiv8gs7l9u9i22ebcl5cu7l7lavd3h8@4ax.com: 

> On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 01:57:53 GMT, Mitchell Holman
> <ta2eeneNoemail@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
>>"Randy Sweeney" <rsweeney1@comcast.net> wrote in 
>>news:pBmcnQzmTue3O7CiRTvUqw@comcast.com:
>>
>>> 
>>> "Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoemail@comcast.com> wrote in message
>>> 
>>>> > So then why have oppresive anti-gun laws on the books, that do
>>>> > nothing except inconvenience decent, law-abiding citizens?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Can I take you want all gun laws repealed?
>>> 
>>> I support the elimination of all laws that infringe upon the right
>>> of the the honest and capable citizen to own and carry firearms.
>>
>>
>>   So, who decides who is "honest"? 
>>
>>   What is "capable", who decides it?
>>
>>   And why the limitation to "citizens"?
>>
>>   
> 
> So I gather you don't qualify on any of the three counts?


  So I gather you don't have an answer and have to resort
to personal attacks instead?