>Rand Simberg
> It was not at all clear what was meant.  What was clear was that the
> writer didn't know anything about space, and it's a reasonable
> inference that the rest of any space-related post from that writer is
> not worth reading.
>
> If people want to communicate, they can't go around redefining terms
> to mean whatever they want them to mean.

Well, Rand, I have "space" in my closet. That is after all a term that means
what it means. Whether you misinfer some EXACT and ALWAYS APPLICABLE meaning
that suits your taste is your own problem, not mine. I note that Interglobal
Space Lines is not offering the weightlessness experience that is readily
available in space in my closet. (You climb onto the shelf then fall off and
experience approximately .5 seconds of weightlessness. Cost only $100:
liability waiver required.)

--

James E. White
Inventor, Marketer, and Author of "Will It Sell?
How to Determine If Your Invention Is Profitably Marketable
(Before Wasting Money on a Patent)"      www.willitsell.com
Also: www.booksforinventors.com and www.idearights.com
[Follow sig link for email addr.Replies go to spam bit-bucket]