In article <3F255443.43979C77@attbi.com>, "Scott M. Kozel"
<kozelsm@attbi.com> wrote:

> See?  He tries to change the subject, again, rather than discuss the
> attributions of the alleged missive.
> 
> "John Maxson" <maxson@iowatelecom.net> wrote:
> > 
> > What took you so long, to continue whining for Mosley?

Face it--Maxson's a moron. You, I, and many other people have tried to
engage him in discussion in a rational fashion. However, failing to
agree absolutely with his lunacy, or daring to question his sources or
assumptions, draws nonsense such as you have experienced.

It is painfully clear that, while Maxson may have something worthwhile
to say, he is utterly unable to either explain or support his
contentions. This is a shame. Where he willing to actually engage in
discussion, instead of flapdoodle such as this thread, he might
contribute something truly worthwhile.

Moe