Sci.space abuse is on topic for sci.space, until something
is done about it.  That includes the abuse you contribute.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)


Sander Vesik <sander@haldjas.folklore.ee> wrote in message
news:1059404707.15643@haldjas.folklore.ee...
> In sci.space.policy John Maxson <maxson@iowatelecom.net> wrote:
> > "Seemed," "when," "most," "appear?"  Do you lame critics
> > ever do *anything* but hedge?
> >
>
> As a matter of fact - 90% of what you post is not just compltete
> rubbish, its downright braindead spamming of the newsgroups over
> and over again with formulaic contentfree messages containing
> accusations of libel and defamation at the top followed by
> message text that has hardly anything to do with such claims or
> with the newgroups these are being posted to.
>
> So how about posting some posts that contain new material that
> is actually on-topic for teh newsgroups or shutting up ? If there
> is no content, there is nothing really to critisize, only to filter.
>
> > --
> > John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
> > Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)
> >
>
> --
> Sander
>
> +++ Out of cheese error +++