Subject: | Re: DNA
| Date: | Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:35:49 +1000
| From: | shane <remarcsdNOSPAM@ozemail.com.au>
| Newsgroups: | sci.skeptic,talk.origins,alt.paranet.skeptic,alt.atheism
|
Katt wrote:
> "johac" <jhachm@ixpres.com> wrote in message
> news:jhachm-EA75D8.21173105062005@news.giganews.com...
>
>>In article <1117958004.051529.44170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>>"Val Mirov" <val.mirov@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Looking at the microbiology, the DNA, the complexity of a living cell,
>>>how can evolutionist not call themselves religous by believing that
>>>cell evolved out of some premordial pond due to chemical revolution.
>>
>>
>>What's a 'chemical revolution'? The molecules started fighting with
>>each other?
>
>
> 'Molecules of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your ...
> bonds...!"
>
And thus began the very first war, which was to result in the survival
of the fittest, the rest, as they say, is history.
>
>>
>>>Not sure WHO created the DNA, but it remains my biggest stumbling block
>>>before BEING ABLE TO DISBELIEF the existence of a Creator.
>>
>>It may be yours, but not mine and a lot of other peoples'.
>
>
> And in any case, the 'Argument from Uninformed Incredulity' is not generally
> regarded as a strong one...!
>
> Katt.
>
--
shane
The truth will set you free.
|