Items in sci.skeptic

Subject:Re: DNA
Date:Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:35:49 +1000
From:shane <remarcsdNOSPAM@ozemail.com.au>
Newsgroups:sci.skeptic,talk.origins,alt.paranet.skeptic,alt.atheism
Katt wrote:

> "johac" <jhachm@ixpres.com> wrote in message 
> news:jhachm-EA75D8.21173105062005@news.giganews.com...
> 
>>In article <1117958004.051529.44170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>>"Val Mirov" <val.mirov@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Looking at the microbiology, the DNA, the complexity of a living cell,
>>>how can evolutionist not call themselves religous by believing that
>>>cell evolved out of some premordial pond due to chemical revolution.
>>
>>
>>What's a 'chemical revolution'?  The molecules started fighting with
>>each other?
> 
> 
> 'Molecules of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your ... 
> bonds...!"
> 

And thus began the very first war, which was to result in the survival 
of the fittest, the rest, as they say, is history.

> 
>>
>>>Not sure WHO created the DNA, but it remains my biggest stumbling block
>>>before BEING ABLE TO DISBELIEF the existence of a Creator.
>>
>>It may be yours, but not mine and a lot of other peoples'.
> 
> 
> And in any case, the 'Argument from Uninformed Incredulity' is not generally 
> regarded as a strong one...!
> 
> Katt. 
> 


-- 
shane

The truth will set you free.