Subject: | Re: Do NOT Call.
| Date: | Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:21:06 GMT
| From: | Lon Stowell <Lawn.Stowell@Komkast.net>
| Newsgroups: | rec.autos.misc,rec.music.beatles,rec.music.classical,rec.humor,rec.kites
|
Approximately 9/26/03 00:07, ynotssor uttered for posterity:
> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:3F731F95.47090424@earthlink.net
>
>>>> Consider yourself lucky. It's constant here. Once my daughter
>>>> starts babbling a little more, I'm going to start handing the phone
>>>> to her.
>>>
>>> Why subject an innocent child to the unknown, unsupervised words of a
>>> potentially hostile complete stranger?
>>
>> Why would they be hostile? Small children usually LOVE to "talk" on
>> the phone, and seldom listen to the person on the other end, anyway.
>
> Kids pick up words so readily that it would amaze one. Their young minds are
> hungry for information, *any* information.
So you have a kid who can say the phrase "free timeshare vacation".
>
> Would you leave your child alone with a stranger in the parking lot of a
> supermarket while you ran inside to buy a 6 pack real quick?
You need therapy for this level of paranoia, seriously. And please
don't have children until you get it... you're dangerous and kids
*do* pick up on levels of anxiety and paranoia this obvious.
>
> Would you take the chance of a complete stranger that you don't want to hear
> from anyway having the ear and attention of your child, while you are unable
> to hear what is being said to that child?
>
> The words "irresponsible" and "passively abusive" spring to mind.
Followed by psychotic and unreasoning and unwarranted fear displayed
by an adult who should know better.
|