| Subject: | Re: Need a pair of top quality binoculars... Any suggestions? e.g. Where to try the best names out [London]!
| | Date: | Fri, 15 Aug 2003 01:09:34 +0100
| | From: | Mike Humberston <oblivion@philomel.net>
| | Newsgroups: | uk.rec.birdwatching,rec.photo.digital,rec.birds,sci.astro.amateur,uk.environment.conservation
|
"Shiperton Henethe" <shiphen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The Swarovski 10x32 were superb! But not perfect...
>
>10x32 WONT TAKE THE ADAPTOR!
>
>My main complaint here is that only the 10x42 accept a
>bloomin x2 adabptor. Can you *believe* it! I find this so
>irritating it's not true.
>
>Guys! I am trying to save *weight* here. That's why I'm not
>carrying a scope you dummies. And that's why I'm planning
>on buying a 10x32 and not a 10x42. Weight!
>
>It is pure snotty optical snobbish that is stopping
>Swarovski from letting us fit the 10x32 with the
>x2 adaptor.
I presume that you tried to fit it. According to the Swaro. web site the
adaptor works with "all EL and SLC models (except 8 x 30 WB)".
--
Mike Humberston
Barnes, London
WARNING: Spam trap in operation. Send any e-mail reply to mike, not oblivion.
|