Subject: | Re: 'IT'S TOO EASY' Shooters' startling appeal
| Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:49:06 +0100
| From: | Malcolm Kane <malcolm@jgj-jewellers.demon.co.uk>
| Newsgroups: | alt.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.animals.rights.promotion,rec.birds,talk.politics.animals,uk.environment.conservation,uk.rec.birdwatching,scot.birds,uk.rec.natural-history
|
In message <3f8ef50c@news.greennet.net>, Jane <nospam@all.com> writes
>"Michael Saunby" <msaunby@despammed.com> wrote in message
>news:bmk3d0$380$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>> Do you care about civil liberties and support the freedom to hunt?
>
>We all care about civil liberties, but your so-called freedom to hunt
>isn't one of them. Animal rights groups have worked very hard to
>ban it, and the public are behind them,
Perhaps in the area where you are. Where is that by the way?
Get up here into "John Peel Country" and the public are most certainly
not behind them.
>and those who continue to
>hunt after the ban will be breaking the law. Your senseless cruelty
>is going to make you a criminal. Have you thought about that?
>
>
The law does not stop the killing of foxes merely the hunting with dogs.
They will be more likely after hunting stops to be snared, lamped,
poisoned etc. I suspect the cruelty will be much greater. There is
nobody in the middle of a dark field at night to control cruelty at
least hunting is in daylight and easily observed.
--
Malcolm Kane
|