| Subject: | Re: INN 2.5.0 with cnfs --- status on Linux?
| | Date: | Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:37:10 +0000 (UTC)
| | From: | jeff@litech.org (Jeffrey M. Vinocur)
| | Newsgroups: | news.software.nntp
|
In article <bk9him$6mm$1@news-out.ftel.co.uk>,
Ian G Batten <I.G.Batten@batten.eu.org> wrote:
>In article <bk9hcr$v74$1@news.cistron.nl>,
>Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@netscum.nl> wrote:
>> CNFS (cycbuff) is reliable on Linux and has been for quite a while.
>
>Thanks for that data point. Does cnfsstat report them correctly?
Did you build INN with large file support? How about Perl?
--
Jeffrey M. Vinocur
jeff@litech.org
|