| Subject: | Re: INN 2.5.0 with cnfs --- status on Linux?
| | Date: | Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
| | From: | Ian G Batten <I.G.Batten@batten.eu.org>
| | Newsgroups: | news.software.nntp
|
In article <bk9hcr$v74$1@news.cistron.nl>,
Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@netscum.nl> wrote:
> CNFS (cycbuff) is reliable on Linux and has been for quite a while.
> Newsgate.cistron.nl uses CNFS with buffers of 80 GB directly
Thanks for that data point. Does cnfsstat report them correctly? If it
doesn't, it may be I was frightening myself needlessly by assuming the
wrong output from that meant the whole thing was broken.
Do you build overviews with buffindexd, or are you transit-only?
ian
|