lein wrote:
>>Leif speaking:  Bork was right. The US Supreme Court has said that the
>>Second Amendment was intended as a restraint against FEDERAL
>>legislation only, not against state and local laws.  There is  no known
>>way for a state or local law to violate that intent.  The federal court
>>system has not once in the 215-year history of the amendment, set aside
>>a state or local law for being in violation of the Second Amendment. 
> So is it okay for the States to pass anti flag burning laws and search
> your house without warrents?

Well, I dont care about flag burning; If some state wants to ban it, I 
dont havta go there. I can spend my tourist money in places that are a 
little more ratioal.

But as for searches, well since my property has been searched *7* times 
between 1968 & 1998 with either no warrent or fraudlent ones, I havta 
say, get over it. It'll only take you a week to clean up the mess they 
will make of your place. Sure, you *could* hire a lawyer, but whoever 
you get knows that he hasta work with the local legal system, so while 
he will take your money, your case aint going anywhere.

"I mite like to move to Russia, where they take their tyranny straight 
up, undiluted with the waters of hypocrisy." A. Lincoln.