X-No-Archive: Yes   On 26 Sep 2003 04:50:31 GMT,
roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter Roberson) wrote:

>In article <8du6nvsor0c6cern49nm059k1rvrqonlr6@4ax.com>,
> <myhome@manitobatelephonesystem.net> wrote:
>|X-No-Archive: Yes   On 25 Sep 2003 22:30:50 GMT,
>|roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter Roberson) wrote:
>|>If one were to answer the questions at random, then the average score
>|>would be 39.55,
>
>|>In other words, people who score in that range should probably think
>|>of the 'test' as little better than Astrology;
>
>|so you didn't fare too well in the test then?
>
>Hard to say. How would one fair well or badly on that test?
>
>My score was within two standard deviations of what you would expect
>if a person were to answer randomly [which I didn't.] The category
>I fell in according to the scoring key had a flattering description
>of me. 

so what you're basically saying is the test blows and you didn't do
well.