I wanna dedicate this next numbah to anonyme (small a) and all you othua
muhfuggas in L-O-V-E...

> On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 20:23:05 -0700,  Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge>
> posted in message <bghv6b$amt$4@pita.alt.net> from
> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
> >
> >I wanna dedicate this next numbah to Anonyme and all you othua
> >muhfuggas in L-O-V-E...
> >
> >> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:22:34 -0700,  Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge>
> >> posted in message <bgflb0$57j$6@pita.alt.net> from
> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
> >> >
> >> >I wanna dedicate this next numbah to Anonyme and all you othua
> >> >muhguggas in L-O-V-E...
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 20:38:29 -0700,  Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge>
> >> >> posted in message <bgfbnc$57j$3@pita.alt.net> from
> >> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I wanna dedicate this next numbah to Anonyme and all you othua
> >> >> >muhguggas in L-O-V-E...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 18:59:53 -0700,  Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge>
> >> >> >> posted in message <bgf5ug$57j$1@pita.alt.net> from
> >> >> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I wanna dedicate this next numbah to Anonyme and all you
othua 
> >> >> >> >muhfuggas in L-O-V-E...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:41:06 -0400,  Dowap <dowap@petitmorte.net>
> >> >> >> >> posted in message <010820031541068646%dowap@petitmorte.net>
from
> >> >> >> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
> >> >> >> >> >In article <c1ljivobifj40gdatc77g36v3jfq2edkg7@4ax.com>,
anonyme
> >> >> >> >> ><anonyme@meow.org> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 06:59:54 +0100,  Peter
J Ross <gadfly@meow.org>
> >> >> >> >> >> posted in message <tte9ivovd2gketgj5ckjt292191s5rnrgt@4ax.com>
from
> >> >> >> >> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
> >> >> >> >> >> >alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk has
never been the same since Sun,
> >> >> >> >> >> >27 Jul 2003 22:53:18 -0700, when Cunt
Tree Boy wrote this:
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> jet@highwaytozen.com (jet) wrote
in news:bg26fb$2vp$0@pita.alt.net:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > [Last time to remove alt.flame.
I don't add it, so I don't have to
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > remove it.]
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Aren't you under court order
to not come within 50 posts of alt.flame? 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > In article <Xns93C5E366D28CBspamspamspamspamspam@65.82.44.187>,
Brave
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > New Worm <spamspamspam@spam.spam>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>jet@highwaytozen.com
(jet) wrote in news:bg201l$ole$0@pita.alt.net:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> In article <Xns93C5C0BC984E2spamspamspamspamspam@65.82.44.187>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Brave New Worm <spamspamspam@spam.spam>
wrote: 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>jet@highwaytozen.com
(jet) wrote in news:bg1ocv$c7o$0@pita.alt.net:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> In article
<4808ivohjc93jqap3vapm0kjih8ptgk0cr@4ax.com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> Suzieflame
<Suziflame@yachtmail.com> wrote: 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>On Sun,
27 Jul 2003 14:58:53 GMT, Brave New Worm
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>><spamspamspam@spam.spam>,
wrote :
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>jet@hell-flame-wars.net
(jet) wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>news:3f23d04d$0$69804$45beb828@newscene.com:

> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
In article <bg0ape$hog$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, "Rolly
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
The Pervert" <tomsq@databasix.com> wrote: 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>"jet"
<jet@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>news:3f2358a9$0$80200$45beb828@newscene.com...
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
In article <bfvhc9$9hi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
"Rolly The Pervert" <tomsq@databasix.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>"jet" <jet@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>news:3f232525$0$44525$45beb828@newscene.com...
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> In article <Xns93C4B7E7632F1eq@206.30.219.231>, EQ
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> <eq@eq2u.us> wrote: 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >bard@dmcom.net wrote in news:3F22F84C.2B84@dmcom.net:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> jet wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>> Is posting -daily- stats spam?
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> Only if it is substacialy the same over a 45 day period
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> and exceeds 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>the
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> BI.  Depending on the stats, yes it could be considered
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> spam (the 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>key
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> factor is how much change there is in the reports).
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> The reports are identical forms. The numbers vary.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>The large kookfart pre-amble does change though everytime.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
"minimally customized". It's still a daily newsgroup stats
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
posting. 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>His his bi count>20 ?
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
Halfway there. OTOH, EQ just posted this to someone who
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
posted the same single sentence reply to *two* posts:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
In article <Xns93C448B0C927eq@206.30.219.231>, EQ
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
<eq@eq2u.us> wrote: 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>flungpooey@yahoo.com (FlungPoo) wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>news:2709792f.0307252214.1836884d@posting.google.com:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> EQ <eq@eq2u.us> NETKOPPED in message
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> Approaching SPAM there, Doc....  Watch it...  :^)
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>                                     EQ
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> But you don't netkop, do you?
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>Never have in EQADH, never will..
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>Canceling SPAM is not NetKopping...
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>Jeezus, I wish you people would learn the terminology and
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>definitions.. 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
----------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>Restore
Jet's cowardly snip
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
Look at the post. I didn't snip anything.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>

> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>The
large kookfart pre-amble does change though everytime.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>His
his bi count>20 ?
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>If not, quit playing hall monitor jet.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
Are you telling me what I can ask David Ritz, now? Quit
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
playing censor. Daily FAQ postings are spam. I just wondered
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
if daily stat postings are, since I really don't know.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>Daily
FAQ postings are spam for a reason. A post where he
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>changes
the first 40 lines or so isn't spam if his bi <20
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>You
fake plonker you, spnak. Thought you were leaving usenet
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>jet?

> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
I don't know where you got that idea. I left alt.flame. You
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
might benefit from reading what I write, rather than what
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>
others say I mean. 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>What
sort of loser would leave alt.flame, much less crow about
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>>it?

> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>Suziesnuh
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> WTF is wrong
with you? You'd think this was the first time a woman
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> ever left
you for being an asshole. Get over it and get on with
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> your life.
Be a man, FFS.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>Leaving alt.flame
was possibly the best idea you ever had. 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Pretty near all
the flamers have. Why do you keep trying to force me
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> to come back, by
adding it to the ng line? Are Suzie, Stain and Kirk
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> lonely, already?
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>So you are a flamer?
; )
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > Absolutely. Why are you
trying to force me to post in alt.flame,
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > Jason? 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> What sort of flamer, exactly,
is scared to post to alt.flame? 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>>  
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >  
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Are you, Dean and
Sloppy going to be protecting Suziesnuh, now, like
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> you do each other?
That's so sweet! You can can do lots of cascades
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> and stuff. 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>I see no one needing
any "protection", Jet. 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > It sure looks like it, with
the snuhers clinging to Suzie like he's
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > their last hope of usenet
salvation. Come to think about it, he
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > probably is.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> What are you babbling about,
you self-spanking netkook? Tell me more 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> about this "Clinging to Suzie"?
I find it/she to be a ham-handed poor 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> excuse for a flamer, personally.

> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Yet she ran you off. Heh. I think
you just have a deep-seated problem 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> with people named Sue. 
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>Is this Suzieflame feller the same
won they used ta call Little Foad?
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >No, but there are several similarities.
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> Why don't you name some of them, Nerdling.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >I don't know which is more annoying, it being Friday
and it's raining
> >> >> >> >> >or you popping your head in usenet again.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> "Popping your head in usenet"
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> Please share with us the process you used to write
that gem.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> Months I've been gone, and here you are still crying
about being
> >> >> >> >> called a pedo. Amazing.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >And here you are, as cunty as ever.  Not so amazing. 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> And here you are, still sniffing my ass. Distasteful, but hardly
> >> >> >> surprizing.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >There's nothing surprising about your distasteful ass, I'm quite
sure. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Alright, HALT!
> >> >> 
> >> >> I used to like you just fine. 
> >> >
> >> >I used to like you just fine too.
> >> 
> >> Well, at least that wasn't my imagination.
> >
> >It might have been mine, then.
> >
> > 
> >> >> What happened? 
> >> >
> >> >Then I got to know you better.
> >> 
> >> You don't know much about me at all.
> >
> >If you were saving the best part for later, now would be a good time...
> >
> > 
> >> >> I really don't know and I'd really like to.
> >> >
> >> >1.  You're a drama queen.
> >> 
> >> Thank you. =)
> >
> >As in "I've been called worse?"
> 
> No, as in, "Thank you."
> 
> >> >2.  You slurp too much.
> >> 
> >> It's been a very long time since I've slurped anyone.
> >
> >Let the record show that the defendant admits having performed slurpage in the 
> >past.
> > 
> >> >3.  You're really bitchy to lots of good people.
> >> 
> >> Iow, I don't like the same people you like. That's a really bad reason
> >> to dislike someone, imo. 
> >
> >No, you weren't like that at first, but if you remember, you had more than a 
> >few detractors follow you over here from other groups, and people here 
> >(including myself) defended you... at first.
> 
> Before I came to this group, I had only posted to basically one other.
> And what happened to me there was an incredibly bad scene, that still
> affects me to a certain extent to this day. If you think otherwise,
> that only proves how very little you do know me, or anything about me.
> 
> >> And I'll just point out here, Checkmate, that I'm never "bitchy" to
> >> anyone who isn't "bitchy" to me first. And even if someone is "bitchy"
> >> to me first, that's no guarantee that I'll return the same. 
> >
> >Ah, come on... please?
> 
> Sorry, that's the truth. So there.
> 
> >> I choose
> >> my battles for reasons, which I think are valid. Obviously, you don't
> >> agree. But then it'd be a mighty boring world if everyone agreed with
> >> everyone else. Imo, again, of course.
> >> 
> >> >> THEN we can get back to trading insults.
> >> >
> >> >Bitch!!!1! 
> >> 
> >> You farted.
> >
> >Maybe it was your breath blowing back in your face.
> ><rimshot> 
> 
> You can play this game alone, I'm sure.

It wouldn't be the most fun game I ever played alone, but whatever... 

-- 
Checkmate
Copyright 2003
all rights reserved