Subject: | Re: What a mess the Star Trek and Star Wars groups are in
| Date: | Fri, 06 Jun 2014 22:54:50 +1000
| From: | Daniel <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au>
| Newsgroups: | rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.starwars,alt.startrek.vs.starwars,alt.startrek
|
On 06/06/14 03:21, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <St_jv.29829$RT5.28913@fx02.iad>,
> Daniel <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
>> On 5/06/2014 1:39 AM, Bill Jillians wrote:
>>> In message <ASEjv.2276946$Sa5.1085102@fx19.iad>, Daniel
>>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> writes
>>>> On 03/06/14 01:48, <p>sychotic <c>hicken wrote:
>>>>> In message <yoZiv.74467$Mk4.23877@fx12.iad>, Daniel
>>>>> <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> writes
>>>>>> On 02/06/14 17:36, <p>sychotic <c>hicken wrote:
>>>>>>> Just checked out some Star Wars and Star Trek groups for the
>>>>>>> purposes of
>>>>>>> cross-posting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are pretty much dead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yads may have his faults but at least he keeps this group active.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you've cross-posted this to four groups, which group are you
>>>>>> meaning when you write "he keeps this group active"??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well I suppose you are not in the only group on the list that has a
>>>>> regular supply of posts and ongoing discussion which is rec.arts.drwho.
>>>>
>>>> Not there, so don't know.
>>>>
>>>>> If you want to drop by please go right ahead.
>>>>
>>>> No, thanks, I've already got enough groups to keep me busy!! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well if you ever get bitten by the Doctor Who bug and fancy an
>>> interesting discussion you are more than welcome.
>>>
>> Thanks for the invite!!
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>
> DW rocks!
Sure does ..... the old stuff even more than the new stuff!!
Daniel
|