In alt.society.anarchy Gabrielle Rapagnetta <cut-out@gmx.net:n0spam.net> wrote:

<snip>

: You began by bashing leftists for being busybodies.  It turns out that 
: it is the right who is pushing for regulation of the airwaves, increased 
: licensing fees, and increased indecency fines.  It's no wonder you now 
: want to talk about wifi.

	I haven't heard a peep out of James or anyone else on the "right" 
here ask for more regulations.  In fact, just the opposite, repeatedly, 
loudly.
 
: Look, I'd be happy to take the anarchist way out of this;

	I guess there's a first time for everything.

: Media 
: concentration would be stopped dead in its tracks and you wouldn't hear 
: another peep from me on the matter.  Of course, you'd then have to 
: justify different means of violence in order to stifle the speech of 
: those you don't want to hear -- like myself.
 
	If he didn't want to hear you, why is he carrying on an argument 
with you on a newsgroup?  And if he wanted to stop you from broadcasting, 
why would he recommend the dismantling of the FCC and "squatter's rights" 
to unused airwaves?  Surely, it would make more sense for him to gain 
control of the FCC and ban people like you instead, but that's the 
diametric opposite of what he proposes.

--
Joshua Holmes
jdholmes@force.stwing.upenn.edu

Does a man tell you of sacrifice?
Beware, he intends to make you the bull.