James A. Donald <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote in message
news:hd58k19jl44ok59ldj6mkjp3eq4vvalnah@4ax.com...
>     --
> "brique"
> > > > Jamess made his comments about HenryVII, I asked
> > > > him to give a source, as that play was never
> > > > written. He still hasn't got back to me on that
> > > > one.
>
> James A. Donald:
> > > The play's name is Henry VI - and your are making
> > > the most trivial spelling flame ever seen.
>
> "brique"
> > Way back when you made your comments regarding the
> > alleged deliberate anti-communist content, I asked
> > which of Shakespeares 'Henry' plays you were refering
> > to, listing them all,  as the one you had mentioned
> > did not exist. You never bothered to reply to correct
> > this simple spelling error
>
> Because spelling flames are boring.

You expressed an opinion regarding a certain passage of an un-named
Shakespeare play. When I asked you to name the play in question, you gave
the name of an unwritten play. I pointed this out to you and offered a list
of all his 'Henry' plays, from which you could have offered the correct
title and noted your spelling error. All very simple and the confusion
resolved quickly. You chose not to correct yourself, indeed, not to respond
at all, which can only leave the assumption that you stood by the title
given as you habitually stand by many facts you quote which are subsequently
challenged.

But, who cares, so Henry VI it is. So, what passage within that play seems
to you to suggest Shakespeare has inserted a specific anti-communist
message, as you claimed originally? Perhaps a few of the lines would be
nice, but failing that, line numbers will suffice.