Items in alt.revisionism

Subject:Re: Black Jews - Double Blessing
Date:Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:32:22 GMT
From:White-Knight <White-Knight@White-Country.org>
Newsgroups:soc.culture.jewish,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism,alt.flame.jews
On 9/12/2003 3:16 am, in article
a0c86b1775505271edb2e79bee6718af@news.teranews.com, "Roger" <roger@ .>
wrote:

> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>  (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>     someone claiming to be White-Knight wrote
>        in message <BBFACB5E.618%White-Knight@White-Country.org>:
> 
>> On 8/12/2003 9:11 pm, in article
>> fcd152b8401e35fd7ecb9e4dca04ad23@news.teranews.com, "Roger" <roger@ .>
>> wrote:
> 
>>> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>>>  (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>>>     someone claiming to be White-Knight wrote
>>>        in message <BBFA8126.5CC%White-Knight@White-Country.org>:
> 
>>>> On 8/12/2003 5:17 am, in article
>>>> 682998081bda2aca96227d598c9df30d@news.teranews.com, "Roger" <roger@ .>
>>>> wrote:
> 
>>>>> So because someone somewhere supposedly does something, everyone who
>>>>> can be associated with the person must be assumed to simply be waiting
>>>>> for their chance to do that same thing?
>>>>> 
>>>>> By that logic, you are simply waiting for a chance to blow up a
>>>>> Federal building killing many people including children who were just
>>>>> there for day care, and we should lock you on this basis.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rather stupid, don't you think?
> 
>>>> Well I am saying that on the whole jews put there race before that of the
>>>> country they live in.
> 
>>> And I asked on what basis you make this assertion, to which you
>>> replied with a single example that didn't even support what you were
>>> claiming.
>>> 
>>> So I ask again:  on what basis do you claim that on the whole Jews put
>>> their race before that of the country in which they live (note the
>>> corrections to your spelling?)
> 
>> The difference between an intelligent man and a educated man is the
>> intelligent man knows shit when he smell it.  An educated man requires a
>> chemical analysis listing the P.P.M. Of shatole and indole
> 
> It's okay to retract a claim you cannot support.  I, for one, will not
> mention it again unless you renew the claim.


You remind me of a small child that asks a question then before the answer
is completed the child then asks why? Then you answer that question and
before you complete the answer the child again asks why? This is repeated
time and time again and no matter how often you answer all the questions the
reply is still the same.  Fortunately everyone I have ever encountered
before has grown out  of it.  You are the first person that I have
encountered that hasn't.  I could sit here till the end of time and you
would never figure it out.