In one age, called the Second Age by some,
   (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
      someone claiming to be White-Knight wrote
         in message <BBFACB5E.618%White-Knight@White-Country.org>: 
  
>On 8/12/2003 9:11 pm, in article
>fcd152b8401e35fd7ecb9e4dca04ad23@news.teranews.com, "Roger" <roger@ .>
>wrote:

>> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>>  (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>>     someone claiming to be White-Knight wrote
>>        in message <BBFA8126.5CC%White-Knight@White-Country.org>:

>>> On 8/12/2003 5:17 am, in article
>>> 682998081bda2aca96227d598c9df30d@news.teranews.com, "Roger" <roger@ .>
>>> wrote:

>>>> So because someone somewhere supposedly does something, everyone who
>>>> can be associated with the person must be assumed to simply be waiting
>>>> for their chance to do that same thing?
>>>> 
>>>> By that logic, you are simply waiting for a chance to blow up a
>>>> Federal building killing many people including children who were just
>>>> there for day care, and we should lock you on this basis.
>>>> 
>>>> Rather stupid, don't you think?

>>> Well I am saying that on the whole jews put there race before that of the
>>> country they live in.

>> And I asked on what basis you make this assertion, to which you
>> replied with a single example that didn't even support what you were
>> claiming.
>> 
>> So I ask again:  on what basis do you claim that on the whole Jews put
>> their race before that of the country in which they live (note the
>> corrections to your spelling?)

>The difference between an intelligent man and a educated man is the
>intelligent man knows shit when he smell it.  An educated man requires a
>chemical analysis listing the P.P.M. Of shatole and indole

It's okay to retract a claim you cannot support.  I, for one, will not
mention it again unless you renew the claim.