In one age, called the Second Age by some,
   (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
      someone claiming to be White-Knight wrote
         in message <BBFAC0B5.611%White-Knight@White-Country.org>: 

  <snip attributions>

>>>>>>>>> No I am forced to live in a country that is made up of
people that
>>>>>>>>> are not of my race.

>>>>>>>> Including the Aborigines who were there way before you were.

>>>>>>> And who were here before the people you call aborigines.

>>>>>> Don't dodge the question, Mr. Mighty-Whitey. Seems to me, by your
>>>>>> own argument, you're the one who should be leaving.

>>>>> As I keep saying I would gladly move to a White Nationalist country if
one
>>>>> existed.

>>>> And as we keep saying, you're more than welcome to -- find someplace
>>>> no one else is living and have at it.

>>> Well when A.I.D.S. and other diseases, war and starvation finish doing there
>>> job there probably be more than enough room for everyone left alive.

>> There is now.  What's stopping you from going someplace no one else
>> lives and setting up your utopia?

>The fact that we need a country where we can live, grow, and prosper under
>our own laws.  If it is good enough for isreal why isn't it good enough for
>white people.

You keep holding up Israel as if it was equivalent to your "whites
only" country even tho it's been pointed out to you that Israel is as
"multi-racial" as America.

Why?

And you seem to be waiting for someone *else* to change their country
to suit you -- why don't you go someplace no one else lives and set up
your utopia there?

>>>>>> But then your own email address belies your claims, doesn't it? You
>>>>>> don't believe in every race in its own place where it's alllowed to
>>>>>> live in peace. No, you believe in one race lording it over all. That
>>>>>> is if you don't believe in one race exterminating all others. It's
a
>>>>>> pity that you're such a pitifuully bad representative of the white
>>>>>> 'race,' if, indeed, you are even white. You could hardly be said to
>>>>>> be a good advertisement for what the world would be like if it were
>>>>>> a 'White-Planet,' after all, right?

>>>>> I have taken into account your above point about my e-mail address.  Please
>>>>> note my new e-mail address.  White-Knight@White-Country.org

>>>> Nice attempt as sidestepping the points William makes above.

>>> What, can't a person correct there mistakes or change there opinions.

>> Sure they can.  You seem to be resisting even acknowledging the
>> irrational nature of your mistakes, which would be a necessary first
>> step to correcting them.

>So I have to correct it to your standards.

No, you just have to not complain when I point out its irrationality.

>>>>>> But that's why most racists are they way they are, isn't it? Their
>>>>>> beliefs are just a feeble attempt to overcome a deep existential
>>>>>> awareness of their own glaring mental, spiritual, emotional and
>>>>>> moral inadequecies.

>>>>> So what you are saying is that we (separatist whether we be white, black
or
>>>>> Asian etc.) do not have the right to think the way we do?

>>>> No, try reading for comprehension next time.  William has not said
>>>> anything which a rational person would even interpret to mean you
>>>> don't have a right to think the way you do.
>>>> 
>>>> This right, however, doesn't change the fact that your beliefs are
>>>> likely just a feeble attempt to overcome a deep existential awareness
>>>> of their own glaring mental, spiritual, emotional and moral
>>>> inadequacies.

>>> How do you know what a rational person is?

>> Because I know the definition of rational.  Here it is, since you
>> evidently don't:
>> 
>> Main Entry: 1ra·tio·nal
>> 
>> 1 a : having reason or understanding b : relating to, based on, or
>> agreeable to reason : REASONABLE <a rational explanation> <rational
>> behavior>

>But are you a rational person?

Yes.  At least I can rationally define my terms when asked, and will
admit if the only justification I have is emotion.

>>> Are you claiming to be a psychiatrist.

>> Do stop trying to read into what is being said to you and concentrate
>> on understanding it instead.

>Well that seems to be the problem you have.

Not that you can demonstrate.  You, however, seem to think advanced
training is required to recognize irrationality, and that even tho
that person explicitly disowns the idea that criticizing you equates
to wanting to infringe your right to free expression.

>>>>> Gees and your kind call me a bigot.

>>>> Well, if you didn't make bigoted statements and champion bigoted
>>>> causes with lies for justification...

>>> What lies are you referring to?

>> That "goyim" means animal.  That converts aren't *really* Jews.  That
>> Israel is nationalistic in the sense that you want for your new
>> country.  That your experience compares in a comprehensive way with
>> that of Jews in the Nazi sphere of influence.
>> 
>> There are more, but those are the biggies.

>This is not a lie that is/was my understanding of the word.

Except that with just a bit of research you could have found out the
truth -- which you didn't do because it suited your delusion to
believe it.

And what about the others, which you have been corrected on and still
assert?