"Ward Cleaver" <Ward_Cleaver@mayfield.net> wrote in message
news:s4vj001qh1lrgrhbgipid72e7t2ng0qnn6@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 18:43:35 -0500,
> <IMjOb.26071$1K1.496519@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
<test@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
> >Yes, you do need to say more.   You need to apologise for your false
claims,
> >smears, personal attacks, and allegations.
>
> Why don't you get McVay to sue me

And how would I do that?   I've never met the man and he lives a few
thousand miles from me.

> which will subject him to IRS jurisdiction

From that comment, you obviously know considerably less than you think.

He's already subject to their jurisdiction, since he still has US
citizenship.  The IRS has done nothing.  Neither has the CCRA.  Surprise,
surprise.

>  and they will be waiting for him seeing how a trial date would be set.

The IRS and CCRA have no need to wait for anything.

They have two sets of things:

First: the facts.    They have all the tax returns and information for all
parties involved, and an intimate knowledge of the laws and regulations.
And, they have the laws and a professional enforcement staff on hand.

Second: *your* false claims, smears, personal attacks and allegations, and
we already know what those have produced - form letters.    No other action
on the part of the usually tenacious tax bodies.

Were your claims true, the only issue would be who prosecuted first, Canada
or the US.

But thanks for divulging your plan.

> McVay has threatened to sue me before for posting the facts

That's not likely to be true.

Apparently neither the IRS or CCRA agree that what you've posted is factual,
since neither have taken any action.   And you've been whining about it long
enough for action to have *been* taken if your claims had any merit.

So it can safely be taken that you are not in possession of facts, and that
what Mr. McVay has threatened to sue you for is posting lies, not facts.

> about his tax dodge

That's *your* false claim.    It is obvious that neither the CCRA or the IRS
agree with you.

> so why hasn't he followed through?

Most probably because you have no significant or meaningful assets.   Civil
remedies are usually measured in monetary terms.    The indigent and poor
are thus generally pretty much judgement-proof.

Now, you really do need to get to work on that apology.

-pk