On 8/12/2003 9:26 pm, in article
c0632da3a2d449be24aefcadabd541ff@news.teranews.com, "Roger" <roger@ .>
wrote:

> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>  (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>     someone claiming to be White-Knight wrote
>        in message <BBFA87F4.5D2%White-Knight@White-Country.org>:
> 
>> On 8/12/2003 5:51 am, in article
>> e4d981437b09b5e2a1830daa6c02744a@news.teranews.com, "Roger" <roger@ .>
>> wrote:
> 
> <snip attributions>
> 
>>>>>>>> No I am forced to live in a country that is made up of people
that
>>>>>>>> are not of my race.
> 
>>>>>>> Including the Aborigines who were there way before you were.
> 
>>>>>> And who were here before the people you call aborigines.
> 
>>>>> Don't dodge the question, Mr. Mighty-Whitey. Seems to me, by your
>>>>> own argument, you're the one who should be leaving.
> 
>>>> As I keep saying I would gladly move to a White Nationalist country if one
>>>> existed.
> 
>>> And as we keep saying, you're more than welcome to -- find someplace
>>> no one else is living and have at it.
> 
>> Well when A.I.D.S. and other diseases, war and starvation finish doing there
>> job there probably be more than enough room for everyone left alive.
> 
> There is now.  What's stopping you from going someplace no one else
> lives and setting up your utopia?
> 
The fact that we need a country where we can live, grow, and prosper under
our own laws.  If it is good enough for isreal why isn't it good enough for
white people.
 
>>>>> But then your own email address belies your claims, doesn't it? You
>>>>> don't believe in every race in its own place where it's alllowed to
>>>>> live in peace. No, you believe in one race lording it over all. That
>>>>> is if you don't believe in one race exterminating all others. It's a
>>>>> pity that you're such a pitifuully bad representative of the white
>>>>> 'race,' if, indeed, you are even white. You could hardly be said to
>>>>> be a good advertisement for what the world would be like if it were
>>>>> a 'White-Planet,' after all, right?
> 
>>>> I have taken into account your above point about my e-mail address.  Please
>>>> note my new e-mail address.  White-Knight@White-Country.org
> 
>>> Nice attempt as sidestepping the points William makes above.
> 
>> What, can't a person correct there mistakes or change there opinions.
> 
> Sure they can.  You seem to be resisting even acknowledging the
> irrational nature of your mistakes, which would be a necessary first
> step to correcting them.
>
So I have to correct it to your standards.
 
>>>>> But that's why most racists are they way they are, isn't it? Their
>>>>> beliefs are just a feeble attempt to overcome a deep existential
>>>>> awareness of their own glaring mental, spiritual, emotional and
>>>>> moral inadequecies.
> 
>>>> So what you are saying is that we (separatist whether we be white, black or
>>>> Asian etc.) do not have the right to think the way we do?
> 
>>> No, try reading for comprehension next time.  William has not said
>>> anything which a rational person would even interpret to mean you
>>> don't have a right to think the way you do.
>>> 
>>> This right, however, doesn't change the fact that your beliefs are
>>> likely just a feeble attempt to overcome a deep existential awareness
>>> of their own glaring mental, spiritual, emotional and moral
>>> inadequacies.
> 
>> How do you know what a rational person is?
> 
> Because I know the definition of rational.  Here it is, since you
> evidently don't:
> 
> Main Entry: 1ra·tio·nal
> 
> 1 a : having reason or understanding b : relating to, based on, or
> agreeable to reason : REASONABLE <a rational explanation> <rational
> behavior>
>
But are you a rational person?
 
>> Are you claiming to be a psychiatrist.
> 
> Do stop trying to read into what is being said to you and concentrate
> on understanding it instead.
>
Well that seems to be the problem you have.
 
>>>> Gees and your kind call me a bigot.
> 
>>> Well, if you didn't make bigoted statements and champion bigoted
>>> causes with lies for justification...
> 
>> What lies are you referring to?
> 
> That "goyim" means animal.  That converts aren't *really* Jews.  That
> Israel is nationalistic in the sense that you want for your new
> country.  That your experience compares in a comprehensive way with
> that of Jews in the Nazi sphere of influence.
> 
> There are more, but those are the biggies.
This is not a lie that is/was my understanding of the word.