On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 13:57:10 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>"Malte Runz"  wrote in message 
>news:6bduaj9l57i6c6qm18derpifrf4fdd7940@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 09:44:59 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"Malte Runz"  wrote in message
>>>news:0qbpajh5dfhet0ei2vtss04s1c0ce274hi@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 22:35:03 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Malte Runz"  wrote in message
>>>>>news:5eikajhaar0mtkvp5ketls5tg0dc38un1q@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:10:44 -0400, Jones <remailer@domain.invalid>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... [Career government employees of every ilk] illegally create

>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>> and do everything they can to thwart progress or
>>>>>>>improvement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm sure you can provide a well documented example of that... right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You need examples of everything because you know nothing.
>>>>
>>>>And here we go again. Luckily I have a lot of patience, so I'll
>>>>explain it once more. When I ask for evidence it's not because I want
>>>>to learn about it from that person. At that point I've already looked
>>>>into it and know how things stand. I ask for evidence because when
>>>>they fail to produce it I've exposed their lies.
>>>>
>>>
>>>And when are you going to expose the MSM lies?
>>
>>When I find one.
>>
>
>You won't if you never look for them.

That's true. Boy, you're smarter than I thought.
>
>
>>
>>In the meantime why don't you do it? And remember,
>>"expose" means find the real truth, provide the evidence, and then
>>show that the MSM source knew that truth, but chose to lie about it.
>>
>
>IOW hold your hand through the whole process as with a child.

Really? You're still pretending to believe that I come to you for
answers? How many times do I need to explain it to you? 10? 15?
Anyway, here I go again:
I ask you to provide examples or evidence, not because I'm too stupid
to figure it out myself, or just too lazy, no, I ask you to do it
knowing that you'll fail, because you don't have what it takes to do
it. And with every evasion, with every fake eye-roll, you prove my
point: You're full of shit!
>
>
>>
>>For an expert researcher like you this is second nature, I know, but I
>>just want to make sure that we speak the same language.
>>
>>>Running to the MSM is how you always "look into it"? What a joke.
>>
>>Give me an example of me "Running to the MSM". Nine out of ten times I
>>find the original source, and I never settle for an opinion piece.
>>
>
>The original source are the cabals.

Everything that doesn't align with your paranoid conspiracy theories
is the evil work of the cabal. Cult-think 1.01.
>
>
>>
>>You, on the other hand... Here, let me give you an example:
>>
>>You go to Rumormillnews, find a link to an X-post where someone is
>>linking to another poster, who says 'EV's are shit. They burn all the
>>time!'
>>
>
>I look at the testimonies of actual experiencers and experts. ...

And if the experts disagree with you they're cabal. And the cabal lies
all the time. That's how you know the numbers are wrong. And when the
numbers are wrong, it proves that they are cabal-numbers, because the
cabal lies all the time, and that's how you know it's the cabal,
because when the numbers are wrong it's cab... Well, you get the
drift.

> ... They don't 
>only report in one place.

They're on Rumble and 4-chan as well, I guess.

>
>
>>
>>I find the stats from a few independent sources that show that EV's
>>are less likely then ICV's to catch fire.
>>
>>See the difference?
>>
>
>You only take info and stats from leftist sources.

It must be so frustrating to always be limited to that kind of
response. 

-- 
Malte Runz