Subject: | Re: Militarism (as opposed to nonviolence and pacifism)
| Date: | Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:33:42 -0500
| From: | Don Swayser <swayser@optonline.net>
| Newsgroups: | alt.politics,alt.philosophy,alt.society
|
Rafael Leyre wrote:
> "Edgar Svendsen" <solon013@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<nAbrd.5170$6K5.2357@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
>
>>I'm not sure that the world divides up the way you say. How would you
>>describe the massacre in Ruwanda? It does not seem as though Ruwanda was in
>>the throes of Militarism, yet great and terrible violence certainly
>>occurred. Mabe Miltarism isn't the only, or even the main, cause of
>>violence although I agree it is clearly one of the causes.
>>
>>Ed
>
>
> I agree. This post was about the military, not about the whole of
> violence.
>
> It might well be true that war is not even the main type of violence.
> But it seems to me that war, of all types, has the most 'normality',
> even 'officiality'. No other type of violence (civil war, ethnic and
> other killings, ecological exhaustion, urban confrontations,
> hunger,...) has been justified - even extolled - so openly.
>
> War is not a good remedy against violence of other types (the
> so-called 'lesser evil' doctrine). I know of no instance where warfare
> delivered such a remedy, unless for a very short time.
>
You mean like the American Revolution or Civil War.
--
The only good leftist is a dead leftist.
Phil Sheridan
Oh Yeah? Let's see you prove he never said it. :)
|