Subject: | Re: We are all One with the Cosmos ...
| Date: | Thu, 07 Aug 2003 01:25:27 GMT
| From: | Charles & Mambo <Duckman@get.lost>
| Newsgroups: | talk.atheism,alt.philosophy.debate,alt.philosophy,talk.philosophy.humanism
|
Max wrote:
>>>How do you suggest we differentiate between "beyond a reasonable
>>>doubt" and "damn certain"?
>>
>>In the case of multiple eyewitnesses, DNA, video recording, fingerprints,
>>admission of guilt, etc.
>>
>>Real life examples:
>>
>>Capital punishment: Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, Timothy McVeigh, Jeffrey
>>Dahmer, robbery-murder recorded on tape...
>>
>>Life-term imprisonment: O.J. Simpson, circumstantial evidence...
>
>
> Without putting too fine a point on it, I wonder how much the quality
> of a defendant's law team determines where they end up on your list.
In my system, none whatsoever. To make it to #1 all we need is what I
already mentioned: multiple eyewitnesses, DNA, video recording,
fingerprints, admission of guilt, etc.
--
Got to be a Chocolate Jesus, better than a cup of gold
See, only a Chocolate Jesus can satisfy my soul
When the weather gets rough and its whiskey in the shade
Best to wrap your Savior up in cellophane
He flows like the Big Muddy, but that's okay
Pour him over ice-cream for a nice parfait...
Got to be a Chocolate Jesus, make me feel so good inside
Got to be a Chocolate Jesus, keep me satisfied
|