Subject: | Re: My New Sig....
| Date: | Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:39:21 -0700
| From: | Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
| Newsgroups: | alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.atheism,alt.evolution,alt.paranormal.crop-circles,sci.skeptic
|
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:06:28 -0400, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger"
<xxx0110@comcast.net>:
>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
>news:bj89a4d1btnkiunq2qdo5psm61fiq7iso8@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:58:04 -0400, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger"
>> <xxx0110@comcast.net>:
>>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
>>>news:i6j6a45si4g8ng991ubr11ri0v3f71nl1e@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:49:43 -0400, the following appeared
>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger"
>>>> <xxx0110@comcast.net>:
<snip>
[re: sig length]
>>>>>Who set that 4 max lines....?
>>>> God; He told me so. Now go away and repent.
>>>Which God is that......?
>> There Can Be Only One.
>Say the name and/or His title......
Forbidden, but here's a reference:
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wagn'nagl fhtagn."
>At least my sig makes sense
...for values of "makes sense" sufficiently close to
"completely incoherent".
>.......and isn't stagnant......
No, just moronic.
>~>
>Twonky....
>
>Hybrid Angel/Messenger
>
><revised>
<...but not improved>
>As easy as 1 2 3.....in other words...in a nutshell......
>
>1 Cain interbred with the Neanderthal......
>2 The Neanderthal disappeared shortly after the Cro-
> Magnon appeared....
>3 The Cro-Magnon were the intelligent offspring of Cain.
>
>Seth added to the genome.....inbreeding with his brother's
>offspring...
>
>And Adam & Eve bore many sons and daughters. Adam
>lived 960 years.....(a kid every 9 months?).....
>
>That makes us an interbred inbred species.....ancient Kings,
>Queens, Jesters & Kingdoms.....Nations, Cultures & too
>many goddamned different Gods......and only two different
>type of forehead, of our hybrid species..........
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|