"Charles Perry" <pipesandtobacco@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"w_tom" <w_tom1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:40EE90C3.AC51CE52@hotmail.com...
>
>All I can say is we have tested it in a lab and even a properly installed
>single point ground , along with a whole-house surge protector can still
>lead to damaged equipment.  You can choose to believe it or not, but that it
>is a fact.

You seem to know your stuff, which is more than can be said for w_tom
(not that I'm particularly qualified to judge either of you). I think
w_tom is a Perl script myself. His name looks like a function call.
The overly verbose style is just to pad out the generated "content" so
you get bored of reading it and don't notice its artificial nature.
The script obviously triggers on "surge protector" as "he" appears all
over usenet posting almost exclusively on this topic.


Tim
-- 
My last .sig was rubbish too.