| Subject: | Re: Judging Clarence Thomas
| | Date: | Tue, 1 Jul 2003 22:28:37 -0500
| | From: | "The Rooster" <Stan@NeverFalls.com>
| | Newsgroups: | alt.fan.bill-clinton,alt.fan.dixie-chicks,alt.fan.j-garofalo,alt.fan.julia-roberts,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.greens,alt.radio.talk
|
Well said.
Stan
+- +- +- +-
"B. Nice" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f2c10c903ed8b16887fd86b9fdce91bb@free.teranews.com...
>
> "The Frog" <jmattNOSPAM@ticnet.com> wrote in message
> news:7ur3gv84nm8pi9rmtvmhrkjfik5oomspd0@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 09:53:09 -0600, John Starrett
>
> > Anyone who makes Supreme Court Justice can say thay have done well for
> > themselves.
>
> The mark of a good Justice isn't whether they do well for themselves -
it's
> whether they prove themselves capable of doing well for *others*.
>
> -b
>
>
|