Subject: | Re: Practical Man's proof of God.
| Date: | Sun, 10 Aug 2003 07:18:22 GMT
| From: | "Pope Dilbert" <Vatican@NYC.com>
| Newsgroups: | talk.religion,alt.religion,alt.recovery.religion,alt.bible,alt.bible.prophecy
|
"DGE Project" <dgeproject@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OaiZa.73851$cF.23233@rwcrnsc53...
> David wrote:
>
> > DGE Project wrote:
> >
> >> Just noticed this
> >>
> >> David wrote:
> >>
> >>> DGE Project wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> ....The purpose of this brief study is to offer
> >>>> a logical, practical, pragmatic proof of the
> >>>> existence of God from a purely scientific
> >>>> perspective....
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Not possible.
> >>
> >>
> >> A true sign of someone whith[sic] an open mind. :)
> >
> >
> > Since your gods are just characters in a mythology,
> > there is nothing scientific to review. It's easy to prove these gods
> > exist ONLY within these mythologies, but there is nothing to prove that
> > they exist outside of them. All you need to do is open your mind to that
> > fact.
>
> And since my view is that this is not mythology, and is indeed fact, you
> dismissing anything as mythology without even considering that it might
> be more than that, is being closed minded.
Then present some rational, reasonable, logical evidence instead of the same
old fraudulent claims.
I actually consider and look
> at evidence that my God does not exist. So far, however, you have only
> (weakly) attacked my evidence, and presented nothing else to replace it.
You have no evidence to attack.
I knew that after the first paragraph .. and it was confirmed with the rest
of the post.
>
> At least "Pope Dilbert" has had some intelligent items to say.
I took the time (which I sometimes do .. .and sometimes don't) to answer -
yet again - illogical, irrational and distorted lies I've seen (and seen
rebutted) dozens of times before.
|