Subject: | Re: Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Ways
| Date: | Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:25:58 +0000 (UTC)
| From: | Mekkala <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com>
| Newsgroups: | alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,talk.origins
|
On 19 Aug 2003, dkomo <dkomoNoSpam@cris.com> screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:3F42B7EC.8C01FAD3@cris.com:
> Mekkala wrote:
>>
>> On 19 Aug 2003, maff91@yahoo.com (maff) screwed up his face, groaned,
>> pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
>> news:18510aff.0308190106.23bd29f6@posting.google.com:
>>
>> One question the article doesn't answer is, why did we keep our head
>> hair?
>>
>
> Sexual selection. Women with long hair look more attractive than bald
> women. Therefore they will have an easier time finding mates and will
> have more children with head hair.
That's ridiculous. *Why* do we find women with long hair more
attractive? Why not bald women? You see, there's always a *reason*
that certain features are attractive to the opposite sex in a given
species. There's no universal physical law as to what's attractive and
what's not. If there was some significant evolutionary advantage in a
childbearing woman having a bald head, we would now instinctively find
bald women attractive.
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly
realized I was talking to myself!"
--Peter O'Toole.
|