Subject: | Re: # ~50~ 200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball!
| Date: | Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:02:37 -0400
| From: | Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca>
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro,alt.astronomy,alt.uk.misc.flat-earth
|
Le 2024-10-22 à 17:07, Geocentric Universe a écrit :
> 50) If the Earth were truly a globe, the Arctic and Antarctic polar regions and areas of
comparable latitude North and South of the equator should share similar conditions and characteristics
such as comparable temperatures, seasonal changes, length of daylight, plant and animal life.
In reality, however, the Arctic/ Antarctic regions and areas of comparable latitude North/South
of the equator differ greatly in many ways entirely inconsistent with the ball model and entirely
consistent with the
flat model.
Similar length of daylight ? Check. They match.
Plant and animal life ? You show your lack of understanding. The arctic
is a OCEAN covered with ice. It lays at sea level. The Antarctic is a
CONTINENT covered with ice. Most of it is at an altitude higher than
200m, up to 3000m.
The Arctic is surrounded by land. The Antarctic is surrounded by sea.
Those differences mean that the climate will vary greatly between the
two. Those ALSO imply some massive difference in the plant and animal life.
100% predicted by the globe model. IMPOSSIBLE to predict on the holy
wafer earth.
100% consistent with the globe, and 0% consistent with the flat fantasy.
|