In article <b1759880.0307191853.64c2286d@posting.google.com>, al_simak@yahoo.com (Al Simak)
wrote:
>thk@lava.net (Tom Kerr) wrote in message
> news:<vhi76ff69ikjb1@news.supernews.com>...
>> <ngs trimmed>

<snip>

>> >And if you are unwilling to
>> >submit (like one other client I have had in 30 years) I simply wish
>> >you good will --and if you paid, hand your check back to you. The only
>> >difference between you and that one client is that you did not go
>> >through usual procedure to get a consultation, nor did you pay.
> 
>> How about a testimony from this one client? 
>
>There was no consultation, we began and she said this is not what I
>expected, and kept interrupting trying to run the show before we could
>get to any points that may be meaningful to her-- she insisted I
>should tell her what was going to happen etc. l;ike a fortune
>teller--I gave her her check back and told her I didn't do such
>things.
> 
>> You really give it away by saying "submit" you know.
>
>You really give it away by resisting. 

Jeeze, now I'm talking to the Borg.

>There is no that's the way it
>is, finding meaning is important because it reflects beliefs--your
>resistance confirms my analysis not denies it, I am sure others with
>psychological training can see that I was not inaccurate about you at
>all.

I would like to ask other people with psychological training how accurate 
Wollmann's analysis is, or whether his reading is just a load of nonsense.