Subject: | Re: You're full of crap, Stan
| Date: | Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:59:42 GMT
| From: | "Michael Legel" <mjlegel@mtco.com>
| Newsgroups: | alt.activism,alt.anarchism,alt.california,alt.coffee,alt.fan.noam-chomsky,alt.politics,alt.society.anarchy,alt.society.labor-unions,rec.food.drink.coffee
|
"Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:51JDc.15618$w07.6439@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> And there's where you're wrong. If your demands are reasonable and you're
> worth what you're asking, odd are you will get what you asked for. If they
> are out of line, you will probably be locked out and lose your job. Do you
> submit that you have the right to strike for $100/hour and be guaranteed of
> not being replaced when your demands are totally out of line with reality?
> That's what you are in effect saying...
>
No Stan, I said in effect what I said. I said both the company and the union
must bargain in good faith. The union and company should only demand a
realistic return for a realistic value. I never said I had the same job
rights for an economic strike. Only that I had the right to strike for
economic reasons.
I said I could not be permanently replaced for striking against Unfair Labor
Practices.
|