the answer is.....why should Starbucks pay  more for union retards...when
they can just go hire retards down the street for 1/2 the wage
and who will have 2x the performance and motivation and really appreciate
the job......or illegal aliens or greencarders.....anything but the genetic
defect union mongers who need a union to keep a job

"bulba" <bulba@bulba.com> wrote in message
news:etqtd09j1rmj62fetqebkuc3q72877jli6@4ax.com...
> On 26 Jun 2004 12:46:36 -0400, gcf@panix.com (G*rd*n) wrote:
>
> >time.  Hence, although "we" are supposedly much richer now
> >than fifty years ago, "we" can no longer afford Welfare,
> >unemployment insurance, free public education, public health,
> >public housing, job health and safety, job training, day
> >care, environmental protection, and so forth.
>
> This is tyranny. Not to mention economic waste.
>
> Oh sure, people love all those things - they sound
> so nice and promise pleasant things for free,
> or at least at the cost of rich people. Or at least
> at the cost of us all. Or at least they may work.
> Or at least we believe in them and we like them.
> Or at least it is not absolutely certain they are
> not completely useless. Or at least it is not
> absolutely certain they demolish purchasing
> power of wages and employment of young people.
> Who are fewer and fewer, because who can
> afford having kids when your wages have been
> reduced to level of serf by all those taxes necessary
> to support those wonderful goodies.
>
> >These goodies
> >began to be withdrawn in the 1980s
>
> These are not "goodies". They are degeneration. This is
> the reason why life in Europe looks grimier and grimier.
>
> >-- about the same time as
> >it became apparent that the last major competitor of lib-cap,
> >Communism, was on the wane.  It is true that some individual
> >employers may be "enlightened", but they maintain such
> >enlightenment as they have against the way of the world.
>
> You're fighting shadows.
>
> There is no employer or employee class. There is no "struggle"
> to "win" anything "from" "ruling class". There is no "people's
> class", no "ruling class", no "rich class". There are only
> individuals in various positions and coming from various
> backgrounds trying to exploit others through governnment
> and taxation, calling it "right" to something, whatever they
> would please them to have.
>
> There are only stupid individuals believing in something-for-nothing
> and that governments can deliver that and governments duly trying
> and invariably failing.
>
>
>
> --
> I love the smell of napalm in the morning.