| Subject: | Re: Death to all drunk drivers
| | Date: | Wed, 7 Jul 2004 06:16:47 +0000 (UTC)
| | From: | "Jez" <jem80@cara.net>
| | Newsgroups: | alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.auto.bmw,alt.autos.bmw,alt.autos.classic-trucks,alt.autos.kitcars,uk.rec.cars.classic,uk.rec.cars.kit-car,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
"Bill Chaplin" <Reo@eskimo.com> wrote in message
news:40EB6E62.D47471E4@eskimo.com...
> Can you substantiate that "greater threat"statement? Bill
>
> Jez wrote:
>
> > "Sir.Tony" <asb_communications@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:yVPFc.23606$HQ1.16655@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > > All drunk drivers are dirty scum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > yes they are.......but the bigger scum drivers are those who drive
sober,
> > but with no tax, insurance, licence, mot. And they are a much bigger
> > percentage of the driving population and a much bigger threat on the
road.
>
You are more likely to be involved in an accident with an illegal driver
than a drunk driver, due to the higher percentage of illegal drivers
(includes illegal cars). And the cost to every motorist is much higher, who
pays the speeding fines for the unregistered cars?
|