Subject: | Re: Should Canada indict Bush? -- AKA Should America nuke Canada?
| Date: | Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:27:57 -0500
| From: | Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>
| Newsgroups: | alt.nuke.the.usa,alt.world,soc.culture.canada,misc.immigration.canada,alt.spacebastards,rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.abortion,calgary.general,rec.arts.tv
|
Gactimus wrote:
> It's kind of a shame, really. I'm sure there are a minority of Canadians
> and French, et al, who're generally good people, who we *law-abiding*
> patriotic Americans can call our friends. But it's also clear that the
> significant majority of Canadians and French, ad nauseam, are flirting
> with disaster, because the United States and our trusted nuclear-armed
> allies like Russia and Israel, et al, are but an hairbreadth away from
> launching all-out global thermonuclear holocaust against nations which are
> notorious for spawning and encouraging the terrorists and their
> supporters--like *YOU*, for example--especially those who hate the USA &
> Israel worse than Hitler & his Nazi henchmen hated the ill-fated European
> Jews of their day.
>
> Axis-of-Evil nations Iran, N. Korea, France, Canada, Syria and other
> doomed terrorist-sympathizing countries are destined to be overrun by the
> US military or are headed for the smoldering nuclear pile.
You've said it in a nutshell. The US is one of the biggest single threats to
freedom in liberty in the world today.
> We've got more
> nuclear submarines armed to the gills with heavy-megaton nuclear missiles,
> nuclear wings of airborne heavy bombers, massive aircraft carriers with
> 1000s of nuclear missiles ready to fire on enemy targets at a moment's
> notice, and missile silos filled with nuclear ICBMs all over the
> world--just waiting for the our Commander-in-Chief and President George W.
> Bush to give the order. That's right. The guy you HATE. The man we
> law-abiding Americans voted back in for a second term because we KNOW that
> he's a God-fearing and trustworthy President who won't surrender to you
So the question is whether he lied to you and got away with it or if you don't
have problems with him lying in order to carry out the American agenda.
>
> Anti-American terrorists like the U.N. and Jacques Chirac, Kofi Annan,
> Osama Bin Laden, Hanoi John Kerry ad nauseam.
John Kerry? Is that the same John Kerry who went to Vietnam to serve his
country, despite his questions about the war, as opposed to the well connected
brat that pulled strings to get into the National Guard and then failed to
complete his obligations? You should read "Tour of Duty" about John Kerry's
service in Vietnam, and see what it was about that war that he objected to.
Being a rabid Bush supporter you are probably more likely to accept the word
of the SBVFT who use the word "truth" in their name but who spewed lies.
>
> So if I were you, if I were aiding and abetting Al-Qaeda & the Islamic
> Jihad against the United States of America and against our friendly
> allies, then I'd be preparing for your lamentable soul's one-way entry
> into the depths of Hades, because that's where you and those of your
> rabidly-insane Anti-American ilk are most definitely headed, and much
> sooner than you think, you foaming-at-the-mouth animal.
It's not about aiding Al Queda and other terrorist organizations. It's more
about not believing Bush's lies. Most of us have trouble overlooking that fact
that his argument to go to invade Iraq was based on claims that he had WMD and
that they posed a threat to the US. We didn't believe that dog and pony show
that Powell put on at the UN. We took the word of the weapons inspection
agency that said they did not think there were any. It's been more than a year
and a half since the invasion, and no WMDs have been found. Your president
has already acknowledged that he acted on faulty intelligence, and found a
goat to take the fall on that account.
We also recognized that as nasty as Saddam was, he was a relatively
stabilizing force in the mid east. That was something we learned from the US
when it helped Saddam in its fight against Iran. We realized that an invasion
would destabilize the country (even more than it already was. And here we are
a year and a half later and Iraq is out of control. There are no go zones
throughout the country where US troops dare not go. They go in to quell
insurgents in one area and some other places erupts in explosions and
killings. It is even worse than it was before Saddam.
We reserve the right to say that we told you so. And look what it has done to
your economy. Your dollar is plummeting on world markets. Your deficit is
growing by leaps and bounds. Yet, you will follow Bush to hell and back.
|