Subject: | Re: There Is No Problem On The Planet Where The Answer Is "More People".
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:46:25 GMT
| From: | Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@citlink.net>
| Newsgroups: | alt.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.flame.abortion,alt.support.abortion,talk.abortion,us.issues.abortion
|
"Robert B. Winn" wrote:
>
> Lawrence E. McKnight <lawrence.delete.mcknight@sbcglobal.delete.net> wrote in message
news:<ii6900hufims7ckf914rul16itmm7ep0db@4ax.com>...
> > On 12 Jan 2004 18:41:28 -0800, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.
> > Winn) wrote:
> >
> > >Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@citlink.net> wrote in message news:<4001EF6B.81FE1F55@citlink.net>...
> > >> "Robert B. Winn" wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@citlink.net> wrote in message news:<3FFF226D.1539968@citlink.net>...
> > >> > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@citlink.net> wrote in message news:<3FFB3D99.C5AB38C4@citlink.net>...
> > >> > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@citlink.net> wrote in
message news:<3FFB13ED.553B46F4@citlink.net>...
> > >> > > > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@citlink.net>
wrote in message news:<3FFA1F29.2AC262CC@citlink.net>...
> > >> > > > > > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray
Fischer) wrote in message news:<btadh1$6i7$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za>
wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >***** Pro-Life is GOOD,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Except for being hypocritical,
misogynist, immoral, and a breeding
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > ground for hate and terrorism.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Well, we all have our little
faults. At least I have not killed any children.
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Are you implying that someone here
has?
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Not implying at all. The number of abortions
since 1973 is fairly well documented.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > So you're stating as fact that there are those
here, in this newsgroup,
> > >> > > > > > > who have killed children?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I have no idea if there are any actual abortion
doctors who post in
> > >> > > > > > this newsgroup. There is a large group of people
who spend most of
> > >> > > > > > their time enabling abortion doctors to commit their
form of homicide.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Abortion isn't homicide... will you please hang up and
try your call
> > >> > > > > again.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Homicide--the killing of one human being by another. Which
do you say
> > >> > > > is not human, the abortion doctor or the child killed by abortion?
> > >> > > > Robert B. Winn
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Homicide - The killing of one *person* by another. The fetus is
not a
> > >> > > person.
> > >> >
> > >> > Yes, we know what the pro-abortion dictionary says.
> > >>
> > >> "Pro-abortion dictionary" = United States Law.
> > >>
> > >> > A corporation is a person.
> > >>
> > >> So?
> > >>
> > >> > My Merriam-Webster dictionary says killing of one human
> > >> > being by another.
> > >>
> > >> It probably says "unlawful" too.
> > >>
> > >> > Also, child- an unborn or recently born person.
> > >>
> > >> So? Status as a "child" has no relevance.
> > >>
> > >> > I really like the Merriam-Webster dictionary. Maybe I could send one
> > >> > to the pro-abortion faction sometime.
> > >>
> > >> Why bother? You seem to only hold interest in definitions which fit your
> > >> beliefs.
> > >
> > >That is a good one. I use a word the way it has been used for
> > >thousands of years and you say I have done something wrong. You use a
> > >definition that I saw you make up during my lifetime and try to tell
> > >me that your definition is the only correct one. Well, you are right
> > >about one thing. I am not interested in your definition.
> > >Robert B. winn
> >
> > 'Thousands of years'? An *English* word? You have lost all contact
> > with reality, if you ever had any.
> >
> > -
> > Larry
>
> No, Larry, I have not. Chaucer used the word childe quite frequently.
> The word is also found in earlier writings than Chaucer's.
Geoffrey Chaucer: 1340-1400
Not quite "thousands of years" ago, now is it?
|