Subject: | Re: Opposition to Abortion is Pro-Woman's Rights
| Date: | Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:11:27 +1200
| From: | no@spam.com
| Newsgroups: | talk.abortion,alt.abortion,soc.women
|
Bob wrote:
>
> LetEmEatWMDs@yahoo.com (Marie A.) wrote in
> news:1dc521ed.0307111040.284b5452@posting.google.com:
>
> > "rms1" <rms1@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> > news:<4iAPa.50015$0v4.3380057@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
> >>
> >> While it is an interesting play on words, it's still not a good
> >> argument against the legality of abortion. You can call it "woman's
> >> rights" or "human rights" or whatever you want. However, there is
> >> nothing even close to a universal agreement that fetuses are full
> >> human beings with the accompanying legal rights. And when abortion
> >> is used as a means to save a woman's life (as it has in numerous
> >> cases), then isn't it against a woman's right to life to deny the
> >> procedure?
> >
> > I was wondering if you might tell the rest of us why it's a "fetus"
> > when it's not wanted and aborted at six months, and a baby when it is
> > wanted and successfully delivered at that same stage of pregnancy?
>
> Maybe because you are attempting to distort the facts. It is a called
> fetus until it is born_alive at which time it is called a baby.
Then how you explain "unborn babies"?
They sure LOOK like babies...
>
> > Please explain the difference here, if any.
>
> I just did.
>
> > Does not wanting it, and
> > calling it a fetus, perhaps aid in the rationalization of the evil
> > going on here?
> >
> The only evil we recognize here is you and other anti-choice freaks like
> you.
Except for all them abortions and the pathetic lies to justify them.
>
> > I was also wondering, when women are pregnant and looking forward to
> > having their baby, why they view a miscarriage with such deep sorrow.
> > Like, what are they mourning here?
>
> Perhaps they mourn the unfortunate loss of a potential child that they
> wanted to be born-alive?
>
> > Just a fetus? If a fetus is just a
> > bunch of nothing as your crowd is always suggesting, why are they
> > crying over this blob of nothing? Maybe you can tackle these two
> > questions. (Marie)
> >
> You are a heartless idiot with no credibility, like most anti-choice
> zealots who post in these ngs.
No, you're just getting your asses kicked. Even your longest serving troll,
Ray Fischer, is sounding more and more like an idiot these days.
Frankly, you'd think he'd gotten sick of getting his ass kicked by every
newbie who shows up.
|